Subscribe to "It's Taxing"
“Taxing” is a word synonymous with “onerous” and “wearing.” Bond Beebe, Accountants & Advisors, have created a user friendly blog called “It’s Taxing” to inform and educate our clients and business associates on timely topics related to tax, estates, accounting and finance. We hope our blog answers your questions and alleviates the heavy burden and anxiety related to understanding complicated tax laws and related matters.
On Thursday, October 30, the IRS announced annual inflation adjustments for various 2015 tax provisions. Two figures to note in the estate planning arena are the Federal estate (basic) lifetime exclusion, and the annual exclusion for gifts.
The Federal estate tax exemption increased to $5,430,000 for 2015, roughly a 1.7% increase from 2014’s $5,340,000. For more information on estate planning and the basics of portability, please see our previous blog post here.
Earlier this week, both the Internal Revenue Service and the Social Security Administration announced cost-of-living adjustments impacting the 2015 tax year.
First, the IRS the announced a number of cost-of-living adjustments related to retirement items. Below are some of the main points announced by the IRS:
Last year, The Supreme Court ruled in United States v. Windsor that same-sex married couples could be treated as married under federal law. This had broad implications for US federal taxes for same-sex married couples, but at the state level the laws continued to vary state by state. When the IRS issued its guidance, they clarified that for tax purposes the IRS would recognize any marriage entered into legally in a state that allowed the marriage, regardless of current residence.
In states like Maryland or the District of Columbia, which allowed same-sex marriages to be performed in the state and also recognized same-sex marriages entered into legally in other states, the federal tax law and state tax law were now in parity. States that had not yet recognized same-sex marriage, however, like Virginia, were left to their own to determine how to treat same-sex couples residing in their state, even if they were legally married elsewhere. Virginia initially ruled that it would not recognize the marriages, and couples would have to file separate state tax returns, even if they filed a joint federal tax return.
Bond Beebe Principal, Brian Wynne, was recently quoted in a Business Insider article about common life changes and how they affect your tax bill. Click Here for the full article.
It is now official that inherited IRAs are not considered “retirement funds” within the meaning of federal bankruptcy law and therefore are not exempt from a bankruptcy estate. This ruling was handed down by the Supreme Court in the case of Clark, et ux v. Rameker on June 12, 2014.
Typically, retirement funds (IRAs and Roth IRAs) are exempt from a bankruptcy estate and therefore shielded from creditors in bankruptcy. This was done to help debtors to provide for their retirement, even after bankruptcy. However, the Supreme Court ruled that inherited IRAs do not qualify as retirement funds.
This post was written with the assistance of Ashleigh Zeller from the Firm's Benefit Plan sector.
With many employers now offering a Roth 401(k) component with their retirement benefits, you may be wondering which option works best for your retirement planning purposes. Like most questions involving tax planning matters, the answer is rarely straightforward.
In this post, we’ll look at the differences between Roth and traditional 401(k) plans, as well as Roth IRA and Roth 401(k) plans, and cover some of the tax consequences you may incur when using these retirement savings strategies.
If you own a business, employing your child can be a great opportunity to teach valuable lessons about earning, saving and hard work. It is also an excellent tax-savings strategy for you and your child. However, before you bring your college kid on your payroll for the summer, there are a number of regulations and savings strategies to keep in mind.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of Md. Comptroller of Treasury v. Wynne, (U.S., No. 13-485, cert. granted, 5/27/14) on whether a taxpayer’s resident municipality can tax all of a resident's income or if it must provide a credit for taxes that person paid to other states. This case specifically addresses Maryland’s denial of credits against the MD county income tax; full details are available in our previous post on this case.